Time
magazine reported that the orientations of U.S. President Barack Obama
about Syria reflect his desire to end the political crisis over the path
without military intervention, something Hopes in the possibility to
achieve even become zero-rule.
The magazine said - in a report aired on its web-Obama ordered air strikes on Libya, standing alongside opposition two years ago, citing the refusal wait to see the scenes of massacres and mass graves there before taking the necessary action to prevent it, but it took a different position for Syria which has already fallen about 70 thousand people, has not shown a genuine desire to stop the massacres in Syria by the same actions taken by on Libya.
The magazine added that Obama has reduced the size of the U.S. intervention in the Syrian crisis and make it limited to humanitarian assistance, at which time a large body of the reports about the role of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency CIA in training some of the elements of combat rebels Syrians, and guide weapons and supplies provided by the Arab states, Sunni to the factions moderate revolutionary.
The magazine that the objective sought by the U.S. President on the Syrian crisis boils down to in the end Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for the violence prevailing in the country, and to give up his post, clearing the way for a new government are moderate, but the brutality used by Assad reflects his desire to fight until الرمق latter.
The flow of arms from Arab countries to Syria opened the door to a wave of violence that may be difficult to contain, especially in light of the various inter-ethnic rivalry there in order to survive or access to power.
The American Journal that the situation described above, which pay analysts to say that the political process in Syria has become the rule of zero-, intensified the debate about what the United States and its allies do, and led to an unexpected rise to the voices calling for the reaction of a more assertive toward Damascus, including what was done by Britain and France recently at the request of ending the ban imposed by the European Union on the supply of weapons to the Syrian opposition.
In the same context, the voices at home the U.S. demanding position critical of the Syrian crisis, and joined the Democratic Senator for the state of Michigan's Carl Levin, who knew opposing extreme of the American war against Iraq, the senator, Republican John McCain urged Obama to impose a no-fly zone in northern Syria supported air attacks "without set foot on foreign land of Syria."
Did not stop at claims Britain and France, or members of the U.S. Senate to intervene to resolve the Syrian crisis, has seen last summer by the U.S. Secretary of State at the time Hillary Clinton and Chairman of the CIA's former David Petraeus presented a plan to the White House include rehabilitation and training and arming of a select group of rebel fighters in Syria, a plan that showed chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta their support to her, is that the plan had not been accepted by Obama.
The magazine said the American, in this context, that one aide to Obama stressed that the U.S. president "studying every possible option on Syria," but critics of the approach Obama warn which may bring non-interference in the Syrian crisis of the consequences of not less dangerous for the consequences of military intervention is considered , stressing that simply arming the Syrian opposition to ensure Washington's influence on Syria in the post-Assad, as well as what would result from a quick stop to loss of life and bloodshed and an end to the instability experienced by the country.
She said Time that regardless of these pressures, the entry of the war in Syrian cities is more difficult than fighting in the desert of Libya, and the supply of weapons to the Syrian opposition offset by an avalanche of gear receives Assad ally Iran, which feared Obama to cause military intervention against Damascus melt the diplomatic nature of its negotiations with West over its nuclear program, add to that the humanitarian aid itself does not go into Syria without the consent of the Assad regime, which means that as many of the opposition is a little much.
And concluded magazine report saying that the Obama campaign as a presidential candidate in the 2008 election formed his image as an opponent forces for what he called the war reckless against Iraq, even with the U.S. intervention in Libya deal Obama doctrine of not getting involved in new wars, noting that he did not head the United States to توريطها in more wars in the Middle East, but to pay it out of those wars.
The magazine said - in a report aired on its web-Obama ordered air strikes on Libya, standing alongside opposition two years ago, citing the refusal wait to see the scenes of massacres and mass graves there before taking the necessary action to prevent it, but it took a different position for Syria which has already fallen about 70 thousand people, has not shown a genuine desire to stop the massacres in Syria by the same actions taken by on Libya.
The magazine added that Obama has reduced the size of the U.S. intervention in the Syrian crisis and make it limited to humanitarian assistance, at which time a large body of the reports about the role of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency CIA in training some of the elements of combat rebels Syrians, and guide weapons and supplies provided by the Arab states, Sunni to the factions moderate revolutionary.
The magazine that the objective sought by the U.S. President on the Syrian crisis boils down to in the end Syrian President Bashar al-Assad for the violence prevailing in the country, and to give up his post, clearing the way for a new government are moderate, but the brutality used by Assad reflects his desire to fight until الرمق latter.
The flow of arms from Arab countries to Syria opened the door to a wave of violence that may be difficult to contain, especially in light of the various inter-ethnic rivalry there in order to survive or access to power.
The American Journal that the situation described above, which pay analysts to say that the political process in Syria has become the rule of zero-, intensified the debate about what the United States and its allies do, and led to an unexpected rise to the voices calling for the reaction of a more assertive toward Damascus, including what was done by Britain and France recently at the request of ending the ban imposed by the European Union on the supply of weapons to the Syrian opposition.
In the same context, the voices at home the U.S. demanding position critical of the Syrian crisis, and joined the Democratic Senator for the state of Michigan's Carl Levin, who knew opposing extreme of the American war against Iraq, the senator, Republican John McCain urged Obama to impose a no-fly zone in northern Syria supported air attacks "without set foot on foreign land of Syria."
Did not stop at claims Britain and France, or members of the U.S. Senate to intervene to resolve the Syrian crisis, has seen last summer by the U.S. Secretary of State at the time Hillary Clinton and Chairman of the CIA's former David Petraeus presented a plan to the White House include rehabilitation and training and arming of a select group of rebel fighters in Syria, a plan that showed chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta their support to her, is that the plan had not been accepted by Obama.
The magazine said the American, in this context, that one aide to Obama stressed that the U.S. president "studying every possible option on Syria," but critics of the approach Obama warn which may bring non-interference in the Syrian crisis of the consequences of not less dangerous for the consequences of military intervention is considered , stressing that simply arming the Syrian opposition to ensure Washington's influence on Syria in the post-Assad, as well as what would result from a quick stop to loss of life and bloodshed and an end to the instability experienced by the country.
She said Time that regardless of these pressures, the entry of the war in Syrian cities is more difficult than fighting in the desert of Libya, and the supply of weapons to the Syrian opposition offset by an avalanche of gear receives Assad ally Iran, which feared Obama to cause military intervention against Damascus melt the diplomatic nature of its negotiations with West over its nuclear program, add to that the humanitarian aid itself does not go into Syria without the consent of the Assad regime, which means that as many of the opposition is a little much.
And concluded magazine report saying that the Obama campaign as a presidential candidate in the 2008 election formed his image as an opponent forces for what he called the war reckless against Iraq, even with the U.S. intervention in Libya deal Obama doctrine of not getting involved in new wars, noting that he did not head the United States to توريطها in more wars in the Middle East, but to pay it out of those wars.
No comments:
Post a Comment