There is no evidence that the Romans Flo Cross on prisoners, 2,000 years ago, and stressed that the issue of the crucifixion of Christ although mentioned in the four Gospels, but there is no historical evidence of authenticity.
He said through his thesis, consisting of 400 pages, that "the myth of execution" of Jesus Christ, based on the traditions of the Christian church and to the picture painters than to ancient texts. Samuelson pointed out that the Bible has misinterpreted, since there are no explicit grounds on the use of nails or steel, but that Christ was carrying a wooden columns on his way to Calvary, a place where solid.
Samuelson said in his thesis that after studying the original texts, the problem lies in the ancient literature without - more impressively - from any mention of the steel operations.
He added that the sources that one would expect to find them on what supports the understanding of the firm for the incident steel does not say something in a matter of fact, and pointed out that the literature of Greek, Latin and Hebrew since the time of Homer to the first century AD teeming as sanctions arrest but does not include phrases such as "crosses" or "steel".
At that Samuelson believes that the contemporary understanding of the solid as a form of punishment can be refuted strongly, pointing out that the New Testament (Bible for Christians) thing not mentioned, much of what we want to believe.
He explained Samuelson, who admits that he is still a committed Christian, contemporary novels texts of the incident, especially the Latin sections of them, used Mughal words in mystery.
He added that the evidence that Christ left to die which is installed with nails on the cross, there are only sparse and remarkable in what texts BC In ancient biblical literature and the Bible alike. He went on to say that the description of the incident the crucifixion of Christ not only found in the four Gospels only.
No comments:
Post a Comment